UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Check the appropriate box:

MARKEL CORPORATIONGROUP INC.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

To the Shareholders of Markel Corporation:Group Inc.:

Notice is hereby given that the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Markel CorporationGroup Inc. (the Company) will be held at Virginia Credit Union LIVE! at Richmond Raceway, 900 E. Laburnum Avenue,the University of Richmond’s Robins Center, 365 College Road, Richmond, Virginia on Monday,Wednesday, May 10, 2021,22, 2024, starting at 2:00 p.m. ET.

The purposes for which the meeting is being held are:

This year, we are again taking advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rule allowing shareholders to receive proxy materials over the Internet. We haveA notice of internet availability of proxy materials was mailed or emailed to most beneficial owners of our shares a notice of internet availability of proxy materials.on or about April 4, 2024. Shareholders can request a paper or e-mailemail copy of the proxy materials by following the instructions in the notice. In any case, it is important that your shares be represented and voted. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting in person, you are requested to promptly vote and submit your proxy by phone, via the Internet, or, if you have received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card in the envelope provided, on which no postage is needed if mailed in the United States.

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 20202023 is being mailed with this Notice and the Proxy Statement to shareholders receiving paper copies.

You are cordially invited to attend the meeting. Directions to attend the in-person meeting may be obtained by writing Investor Relations, at 4521 Highwoods Parkway, Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060 or by emailing investorrelations@markel.com.IR@markel.com. If you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to register in advance, and to review the event and venue information made available, at www.MKLReunion.com.

20212024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 202122, 2024

The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors (the Board) of Markel Corporation (theGroup Inc. (Markel Group, or the Company) for use at the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the 20212024 Annual Meeting) to be held May 10, 2021,22, 2024, or any adjournments of the meeting, for the purposes set forth in this Proxy Statement and the attached Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the E-Proxy Notice), containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20202023 (the Annual Report to Shareholders) online, was mailed or emailed to most of the Company’s shareholders on or about March 23, 2021.April 4, 2024. On or about that date, we also began mailing a full set of proxy materials to other shareholders, including those shareholders who had previously requested paper copies of our proxy materials.

If you received the E-Proxy Notice by mail, you will not automatically receive a paper copy of the proxy materials. Instead, the E-Proxy Notice instructs you how you may access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials, including the Annual Report to Shareholders. The E-Proxy Notice also instructs you how you may submit your proxy. If you would like to receive a paper or e-mailemail copy of our proxy materials, including the Annual Report to Shareholders, you should follow the instructions for requesting suchthose materials included in the E-Proxy Notice.

Record Date

The Board has fixed the close of business on March 2, 2021,14, 2024 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting2024 Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Each holder of record of the Company’s Common Stock,common stock, no par value (the Common Stock), on the record date will be entitled to one vote for each share registered in his or herthe holder’s name with respect to each matter properly brought before the meeting.2024 Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on the record date, 13,776,20813,037,342 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting.2024 Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock on the record date constitutes a quorum for the meeting.2024 Annual Meeting. Abstentions and shares held of record by a broker non-votesor its nominee that are voted on any matter at the 2024 Annual Meeting are counted in determining a quorum.

Solicitation

If sufficient proxies are not returned in response to this solicitation, supplementary solicitations may also be made by mail, telephone, electronic communication or personal interview by directors, officers and employees of the Company, none of whom will receive additional compensation for these services. The Company may retain an outside proxy solicitation firm to assist in the solicitation of proxies, but at this time does not plan to do so. Costs of solicitation of proxies will be borne by the Company, which will reimburse banks, brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held by them.

Proxies

The shares represented by all properly executed proxies timely received by the Secretary of the Company will be voted as set forth in the proxy. Where no direction is given for a proposal on a timely received proxy, such proxy will be voted in the manner recommended by the Company for that proposal. Any proxy may be revoked at any time before the shares to which it relates are voted, either by written notice (which may be in the form of a substitute proxy bearing a later date delivered to the secretarySecretary of the meeting)Company) or by attending the meeting2024 Annual Meeting and voting in person.

Householding

The Company has adopted the “householding” procedure approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which allows us to send one copy of the Proxy Statement, the Annual Report to Shareholders and/or the E-Proxy Notice to multiple shareholders sharing an address, unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. This procedure is more environmentally friendly and cost-effective because it reduces the number of copies to be printed and mailed.

If you would like to change your householding election, request that a single copy of the proxy materials be sent to your address, or request a separate copy of the proxy materials, please contact our distribution agent, Broadridge Financial Solutions, by calling 1-866-540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. We will promptly deliver the proxy materials to you upon receipt of your request. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker, or other record holder to request information about householding.

Votes Required

DirectorsThe following table summarizes the votes required to approve each proposal that will be elected by a majority ofvoted on at the votes cast, unless the election is contested. A majority of votes cast means that the number of shares voted for a director exceeds the number of votes cast against the director. In a contested election, where the number of nominees for director exceeds the number of directors to be elected, directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. If there are more persons properly nominated for election than the number of available Board positions, then the nominees receiving the most2024 Annual Meeting, how votes will be electedcounted for each proposal and the available positions. The approval, on an advisory basis, of executive compensation requires more votes in favor than votes against. The ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm requires more votes in favor than votes against. Broker discretionaryBoard’s voting is permitted onlyrecommendation for the proposed ratification of the selection of the Company’s independent public registered accounting firm. Broker non-votes and abstentions will not be counted as votes cast in favor or against any of the items presented.each proposal:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Eleven incumbent directors and one director nominee are nominated for election to the Board for a one-year term expiring at the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their respective successors are elected.elected and qualified. The Board currently consists of thirteentwelve directors.

Each of Stewart M. Kasen and Darrell D. MartinK. Bruce Connell is not standing for re-election at the 20212024 Annual Meeting.Meeting of Shareholders. Consequently, each of Mr. Kasen and Mr. MartinConnell will cease to be a director of the Company effective as of the adjournment of the 20212024 Annual Meeting. The Board has nominated Greta J. Harris to stand for election as successor to Mr. Kasen at the 2021 Annual Meeting. However, the Board will not be nominating a director to stand for election as successor to Mr. MartinConnell at the 20212024 Annual Meeting. Rather, the Board has adopted and approved a reduction in the size of the Board by one and fixed the number of directors of the Company at twelve,eleven, effective as of the adjournmentcommencement of the 20212024 Annual Meeting. As a result, no more than twelveeleven directors can be elected at the 20212024 Annual Meeting.

All of the Company’s current directors were elected by the shareholders at the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 20202023 Annual Meeting), except for A. Lynne Puckett and Mark M. Besca, who were elected by the Board, effective as of August 20, 2020 and November 18, 2020, respectively.. All of the Company’s current directors, other than Ms.A. Lynne Puckett, and Mr. Besca, attended the 20202023 Annual Meeting and, due to the public health impact of the coronavirus, and in compliance with governmental orders and directives, did so via webcast. All nominees are expected to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting, absent unusual circumstances.

Each of the nominees has consented to being named as a nominee in this Proxy Statement, has agreed to serve if elected, and has furnished to the Company the information set forth in the following table. All nominees are expected to attend the 2024 Annual Meeting, absent unusual circumstances.

The Board believes that each nominee possesses integrity; leadership and policy making experience; the communication and interpersonal skills necessary to function effectively as a member of a decision-making body; and the ability to act in the best interests of the shareholders in order to serve the Company. In addition, the nominees collectively bring to the Board a combination of business and financial expertise, community service, and diversity of experience and of background to equip the Board to deal with the range of issues it must address.

Family Relationships

Anthony F. Markel and Steven A. Markel are first cousins.

ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), we are asking shareholders to approve the following non-binding advisory resolution at the 20212024 Annual Meeting:

While this vote is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee, which is comprised of independent directors, will take the outcome into account in considering future executive compensation arrangements.

RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

KPMG LLP has been selected by the Audit Committee of the Board as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the current fiscal year, subject to ratification by the shareholders. KPMG LLP has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1980. Representatives of KPMG LLP are expected to be present at the 20212024 Annual Meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG LLP, the selection of anotherthe independent registered public accounting firm will be consideredreconsidered by the Audit Committee.

Total payments byThe aggregate fees billed to the Company toby KPMG LLP for 20202023 and 20192022 were $8,570,260$10,685,420 and $10,417,420,$10,379,998, respectively. Further details are set forth below.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for audit services for 20202023 and 20192022 were $7,117,580$9,480,000 and $8,887,130,$9,137,000, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for audit-related services for 20202023 and 20192022, and not otherwise reported in the preceding paragraph, were $831,620 and $845,377, respectively. The fees for 2023 and 2022 were primarily for employee benefit plan and subsidiary audits and other attestation services were $942,500 and $730,810, respectively.subsidiary audits.

Tax Fees

No fees were billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for tax services for 2023. The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for tax services for 2020 were $69,740,2022, primarily for tax consulting services, and for 2019 were $495,480, primarily for tax compliance.$56,951.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed to the Company by KPMG LLP for all other services for 20202023 and 20192022 were $440,440$373,800 and $304,000,$340,670, respectively. The nature of the services provided was primarily for actuarial certifications and services in both years. The actuarial certifications and services provided by KPMG LLP consist primarily of providing actuarial opinions and summaries to regulatory authorities after the Company has determined the amount of reserves to be recorded in the financial statements.

Pre-approval of Services

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee has delegated authority for pre-approval between meetings to one or more of its members, provided any decision to grant pre-approval is presented to the full committee at its next scheduled meeting.

The following table and footnotes set forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of Common Stock of the Company as of March 2, 2021,14, 2024, except as otherwise noted, by: (i) each director or director nominee; (ii) each executive officerperson named in the Summary Compensation Table; (iii) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of its outstanding Common Stock; and (iv) all directors, director nominees and executive officers of the Company as a group (21(18 persons). For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” includes, as required by applicable regulations, shares over which a person has, or shares, voting or investment power. Except as otherwise indicated, each of the personsperson named below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by that person. In addition, except as otherwise indicated, the address for each person named below is c/o Markel Corporation,Group Inc., 4521 Highwoods Parkway, Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060.

Policy on Hedging and Pledging of Company Stock

In February 2021, theThe Board has adopted an updateda hedging and pledging policy applicable to the Company’s executive officers and directors. The updated policy:

Compliance with the policy is reviewed by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee on an annual basis. In February 2021,2024, the Committee conducted a review of the policy and of the number of shares pledged by the Company’s executive officers and directors, the number of the Company’s outstanding shares and the Company’s 30-day average daily trading volume. The Committee acknowledged that over the last several years the number of shares pledged by executive officers and directors has been substantially reduced. The Committee also acknowledged that, as descendants of Sam Markel, who in the 1930s formed the company that Anthony F. Markel and Steven A. Markel would later take public in 1986, it is not surprising that a significant portion of their net worth is held in the form of Markel stock.shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Pledging has enabled them to unlock a portion of the value of their stock without having to sell it. Within the constraints set forth in the policy, the Committee affirmed its support of this approach. The Committee reviewed the outstanding pledge balances, if any, of each of the Company’s executive officers and directors and confirmed the adequacy of and compliance with the policy.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committees; Meetings; Guidelines and Charters; Director Independence

The Company has standing Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees of the Board. The following table reflects the current membership and the chair of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee:these committees:

In 2020,2023, the Board and its committees held the following number of meetings:

EachIn 2023, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings held by the Board (during the period for which the director served as a director) and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served.the director served (during the period(s) that the director served).

The Board has determined that, of the current directors, Messrs. Besca, Connell, Kasen, Lewis, Martin,Cunningham, Housel, Morrison and O’Reilly and Mses. Harris, Leopold and Puckett are each “independent” of management, and that Ms. Harris satisfies the requirements for being “independent” of management under the categorical standards for determining independence adopted by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. These categorical standards incorporate applicable independence rules of the NYSE.New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, respectively, meets applicable NYSE independence standards for service on those committees. In addition, each member of the Compensation Committee is a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Exchange Act. No additional factors were identified that would impair any Compensation Committee member’s ability to make independent judgments about the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.

Under the categorical standards adopted by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, a director is considered independent without further Board determination if the director meets NYSE standards, unless:

For these purposes,purposes: “Company” includes Markel Group Inc. and any of its consolidated subsidiaries; and “immediate family” meansfamily member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares the person’s home.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Steven A. Markel has served as Chairman of the Board since May 2020, having succeeding Alan I. Kirshner, who retired2020.

Effective January 1, 2023, Mr. Gayner was appointed by the Board as a director and Chairmansole Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Board at the end of the 2020 Annual Meeting after having served as such since the Company became a public company in 1986.

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that continued Board membership of a former Chief Executive OfficerCEO of the Company is a matter to be decided in each individual instance, and that when a Chief Executive OfficerCEO resigns from that position, he or shethe CEO should offer to resign from the Board at that time.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide for the designation of a Lead Independent Director by the Company’s non-employee directors. The Lead Independent Director presides at meetings of the non-employee directors and is responsible for communicating to the Chairman of the Board regarding the meetings. Mr. KasenO’Reilly has served as Lead Independent Director since 2011. As previously acknowledged, Mr. Kasen is not standing for re-election and will cease to be a director effective as of the adjournment of the 2021 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, the non-employee directors have appointed Mr. O’Reilly to succeed Mr. Kasen as Lead Independent Director at that time.May 2021.

The Audit CommitteeBoard and the BoardAudit Committee are principally responsible for monitoring risk management by the Company. Management regularly reports to the Audit CommitteeBoard and the BoardAudit Committee on litigation risks, underwriting risks, operating risks, reserving issues, investment risks, cybersecurity risks, reinsurance and catastrophe risk management. Management also has established an enterprise risk management committee which periodically reports on its activities to the Audit CommitteeBoard or the Board.Audit Committee. In addition, management reviews with the Compensation Committee the design of the Company’s incentive compensation programs to assist in evaluating whether the programs might encourage the taking of excessive or unnecessary risks in order to earn incentive compensation.

The Board conducts an annual self-evaluation and has determined in connection with past self-evaluations that both its processes and the performance of its functions were appropriate.

Executive Sessions

The non-employee directors (all of whom are independent) meet in executive session without management at each regularly scheduled Board meeting and at such other times as the non-employee directors deem appropriate.

Communications with Directors

Any security holder or other interested party wishing to communicate with the Board as a whole, the non-employee directors or an individual director should write to “Board of Directors,” “Non-Employee Directors” or the individual director in care of the Company Secretary at 4521 Highwoods Parkway, Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060. Communications from security holders or other interested parties addressed in this fashion will be sent directly to the Board, the non-employee directors or the individual director, as applicable.

The following table sets forth compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors for 2020:2023:

Upon election to the Board, each non-employee director is paid an annual retainer fee of $95,000$110,000 (or a pro-rated portion thereof if elected to the Board after the annual meeting of shareholders). The Lead Independent Director, Mr. Kasen,O’Reilly, also receives an additional annual retainer fee of $25,000.$30,000. The retainer fee is paid in cash, except to the extent the director chooses to receive his or herthe fee in the form of shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In addition, each non-employee director is reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings.

Upon election to the Board, each non-employee director also receives an annual grant of restricted stock valued at approximately $125,000$165,000 (or a pro-rated portion thereof if elected to the Board after the annual meeting of shareholders), calculated based on the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the grant date.

The Company matched up to $15,000 in charitable contributions made by each non-employee director in 2020. The “All Other Compensation” column in the table above includes the following amounts representing matching gifts: Mr. Besca ($10,000); Mr. Connell ($12,500); Mr. Kasen ($6,000); Ms. Leopold ($15,000); Mr. Lewis ($15,000); Mr. Martin ($15,000); and Mr. O’Reilly ($15,000). In addition, the amount of “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Connell includes an annual fee of $50,000 paid to Mr. Connell in cash as compensation for his service as a non-executive director of the Company’s Bermuda insurance subsidiary for 2020.includes:

The Company places a strong emphasis on equity ownership by executive officers and other members of senior management and in 2012, ithas extended that philosophy to its Board by adopting stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors. The guidelines require non-employee directors to acquire and maintain ownership of Common Stock with a value at least equal to five times the annual cash retainer paid. Following an increase in the ownership requirement due to an increase in the annual cash retainer paid, the non-employee directors have five years to comply with the additional ownership expected to be held due to the annual cash retainer increasing. All shares acquired under the 2016 Stock Purchase Plan and the 2020 Stock Purchase Plan count toward ownership requirements along with any restricted stock granted but not vested. Purchased shares are valued at the higher of cost to the director or market. All current non-employee directors meet the guideline requirements, except for Messrs. Besca and Morrison and Ms. Puckett. However, newly-elected non-employee directors, including Messrs. Besca and Morrison and Ms. Puckett, are expected to reach the required minimum levels of ownership within five years of their initial election to the Board.requirements.

Audit Committee

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence; and (iv) the performance of the independent auditors and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. In addition, the Committee provides an avenue for communication between the internal auditors, the independent auditors, financial management and the Board. The Committee meets in executive session at each of its regularly scheduled meetings, meeting privately with the independent auditors, key members of management and the Managing Director of Internal Audit. The Committee conducts an annual self-evaluation and has determined in connection with past self-evaluations that both its processes and the performance of its functions were appropriate.

The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate, and that Messrs. Besca Kasen, Lewis and O’Reilly are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act. In making these determinations, the Board considered, among other things, the experience described under “Election of Directors” above and other relevant experience as summarized below:

Mr. Besca - As a senior executive of EY (formerly Ernst & Young, LLP), he has thirty years experience serving as a lead and senior advisory audit partner of Fortune 500 companies in the Media and Entertainment, Consumer Products and Airline industries. He brings a broad array of skills and expertise to the BoardCommittee from his many years of advising major corporations across a number of industries.

Mr. Connell - As Executive Vice President and Group Underwriting Officer of XL Capital Ltd. as well as chief executive and underwriter at various subsidiaries and predecessors to XL Capital Ltd., he has thirty years experience of combined insurance and financial expertise.

Mr. Morrison - He has over thirty years of combined insurance, administrative and financial experience. Mr. Morrison served as Senior Vice President, Chubb Group, and Division President, Field Operations, North America Insurance of Chubb Insurance Company, after previously serving in several other senior executive management positions at Chubb. He is a proven industry leader, who brings deep administrative and operational experience on a global level to the Committee.

Mr. O’Reilly - He has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Chubb Corporation for six years after having previously served as Chief Investment Officer. Mr. O’Reilly’s combination of insurance and financial experience is a valuable asset to the Committee.

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to, among other things: (i) review and approve corporate goals and objectives relevant to compensation for the Company’s executive officers; (ii) review and evaluate the performance of the CEO and the Company’s other executive officer performance and,officers in light of that performance,such goals and objectives and, based on these evaluations, determine and approve their annual and long-term compensation; (iii) administer the Company’s incentive stock plans; and (iv) review and approve, or recommend to the full Board, executive incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans in which the Company’s executive officers and members of the Board are eligible to participate. The Committee also discusses succession planning withregarding the Co-CEOs andCEO, the Company’s other executive officers, and certain specified key executives of the Company’s operating companies, and periodically reports its views on succession to the full Board, giving due consideration to succession in the event of an emergency or unanticipated retirement of key executive officers.any of these employees. The Committee conducts an annual self-evaluation and has determined in connection with past self-evaluations that both its processes and the performance of its functions were appropriate.

The Compensation Committee has full authority over compensation of the executive officers of the Company. This authority is not delegated to any other person.

The Committee annually reviews and, if appropriate, resets the compensation of the Company’s executive officers taking into account, among other factors, years of service; level of experience; individual areas of responsibility; the annual rate of inflation; the Company’s operating performance; and total compensation opportunities relative to compensation opportunities of other members of management of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Committee considers recommendations from senior management in the course of its review.

In 2020,2023, senior management engaged an outside compensation consultant, Compensation Advisory Partners LLC (CAP), to provide current market research and analyses against which executive compensation programs and proposals could be evaluated. Senior management worked with CAP to make recommendations regarding executive compensation that are consistent with the Company’s objectives. CAP reported directly to senior management and, in turn, senior management presented data, analysis and recommendations to the Compensation Committee for review and consideration. CAP did not engage directly with the Compensation Committee or the Board. For additional information regarding senior management’s engagement with CAP, see “Compensation Setting Process” below.

For 2020,2023, the aggregate fees paid to CAP for its advice and recommendations on the amount and form of executive compensation was $52,660, and the aggregate fees for other additional services it provided was $7,880.$184,300.

The Committee has authority to retain, appoint, compensate and oversee the work of compensation advisers and require the Company to provide reasonable compensation to such advisers as determined by the Committee. Neither the Committee nor the Board has retained compensation consultants to assist it in determining the amount or form of compensation for executive officers or directors. When applicable, the Committee will conduct independence assessments of compensation advisers who provide advice to the Committee in accordance with the independence factors established by the NYSE, as then in effect.

The Committee also reviews and assesses the compensation paid to non-employee members of the Board and recommends to the Board any changes the Committee believes are appropriate.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is appointed by the Board toto: (i) identify individuals qualified to become Board members; (ii) assist the Board in reviewing the independence, skills and characteristics of Board members, as well as the size, composition and leadership structure of the Board and its Committees; (iii) recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders and to fill any vacancies on the Board; (iv) recommend to the Board

While the Committee has not adopted minimum criteria, it considers several qualifications when considering candidates for the Board. The Committee seeks a mix of skills and experience on the part of Board members that will maximize the Board’s effectiveness. Among attributes the Committee takes into account are: integrity; leadership and policy making experience; business and financial expertise; government or community service; diversity of experience, background and perspectives; and the ability to act in the best interests of all shareholders. None of the attributes is given any particular weight in selecting a candidate. The Committee does not have a policy with respect to director diversity, but considers diversity, in its broadest sense, in selecting candidates who have a mix of experiences, backgrounds and perspectives that will enhance the quality of the Board’s interactions and decisions. The Committee also seeks to have candidates with a diversity of backgrounds, perspectives and experience that complement the backgrounds, perspectives and experience of others on the Board. The Committee conducts an annual self-evaluation and has determined in connection with past self-evaluations that both its processes and the performance of its functions were appropriate.

The Committee will consider candidates recommended by shareholders for consideration as directors on the same basis it evaluates other candidates. Any shareholder wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration should write to the ChairmanChair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in care of the Company Secretary at 4521 Highwoods Parkway, Glen Allen, Virginia, 23060. See “Shareholder Proposals” below for requirements that must be met for including a director nominee in the Company’s proxy materials for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or for nominating a director at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Code of Conduct

Review of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transactions Policy pursuant to which the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for conducting a reasonable prior review of all related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest. The Committee must prohibit a transaction if it determines the transaction to be inconsistent with the interests of the Company and its shareholders. Under the policy, a related party transaction is a transaction required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act.

In addition to the Related Party Transaction Policy, executive officers and directors must also comply with the Company’s Code of Conduct. Under the Code of Conduct, executive officers and directors should avoid actual or apparent conflicts of interest, and any potential conflict of interest or waiver that involves a director oran executive officer or director must be approved by the Board or a designated committee. All such transactionsthe Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.

Anthony F. Markel and Steven A. Markel are reviewed by the Board. In connection with the Board’s review, the Board is adviseddirectors and employees of the material facts relating toCompany. In 2023, total compensation for them as employees was approximately $276,000 and $277,174, respectively. They did not receive any compensation for

Mr. Gayner’s spouse is employed by a Company subsidiaryretired as President and Chief Executive Officer.Officer of a Company subsidiary in 2022, and in 2023 she had a consulting arrangement with that and another Company subsidiary. In 2020,2023, total compensation to Mr. Gayner’s spouse was approximately $294,170.$157,500.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Corporate Responsibility

Markel Group Inc. is a diverse financial holding corporation serving a variety of niche markets. At Markel Group, our culture is our greatest asset and is defined by the Markel Style, a timeless statement of our values and mission that is woven into our corporate DNA. The Markel Style provides a roadmap as we strive to build an enduring organization. Within this roadmap are principles on how we interact with our stakeholders. We seek to know our customers’ needs and to provide our customers with quality products and services. We provide an atmosphere in which people can reach their personal potential and work in a spirit of teamwork. We pledge to our shareholders we will build the financial value of their company. We respect our suppliers, and we have a commitment to our communities. These words wereThe Markel Style was written in 1986 and remainremains our guidepostsguidepost today.

Key within the Markel Style is the encouragement to look for a better way to do things, to challenge management. We also seek spontaneity and flexibility and a respect for authority, but disdain for bureaucracy. Our diverse financial holding company is managed in a way to accomplish these principles. Each of our businesses operates with a high degree of autonomy so long as they operate within the principles of the Markel Style. This allows our managers to make decisions that are best for their employees, customers, and communities, as well as our shareholders.

We illustrate in further detail in the paragraphs below somea variety of the ways in which Markel, our principalinsurance business which underwrites specialty insurance products is operated consistent with this approach.the Markel Style.

We have a well-developed performance-management process, which is conducted in close coordination with our multiple levels of management and leadership development training. We also encourage employees within our Markel insurance operations to own their career development by taking advantage of training offered through our Markel University,Workday Learning platform, as well as through courses and programs outside of Markel that are offered through professional organizations, academic institutions, and similar organizations. We also have undertaken significant work over recent years to establish global leadership development programs for different levels of leadership at Markel, including partnering with various renowned business schools to create leading-edge curricula in this area.

Employee health and overall well-being is also a key priority, and we provide a range of employee and eligible partner plans and programs, including health and voluntary benefits.benefits, within our insurance operations. These offerings include a variety of financial protection programs to help our employees meet their unique investment and savings needs including life insurance, retirement savings with company contributions in most situations and an employee stock purchase plan. Comprehensive employee assistance programs are available in all our major markets along with other well-being and fitness resources.resources, including an employee led Global Wellbeing Network.

We rely on our employees’ ideas and input to help make Markel a great place to work. For example, we conductsenior leadership conducts regular pulse surveys ofemployee communications meetings along with question and answer sessions across Markel providing opportunities for employees regarding their well-being andto share their ideas on how we can improve employee engagement. In addition, every two years we conduct a major, global employee engagement survey within our insurance operations, which historically hasin early 2022 garnered more than 80%88% participation, and which enables us to identify, focus on and track progress against key engagement drivers.drivers and external norms for high performing companies. This survey has generated additional ideas for employee engagement; and we have made substantial changes and improvements in our human capital practices based on this feedback. Plans are underway to conduct an employee engagement survey in early 2024. Additionally, Markel conducts regular pulse and employee net promoter score surveys on a departmental level across the organization throughout the year.

We are committed to embracing all aspects of diversity, including diversity of perspective, which we believe is crucial to sustainable success. Markel accordingly supports and encourages focused efforts to continue to build the diversity of our employee population and the inclusiveness of our culture. Our diversity and inclusion efforts seek to cultivate an inclusive environment in which every employee feels valued, respected and accepted. We believe this environment helps us increase creativity and innovation, foster business connections, serve our customers and maintain our market leadership.

OurWithin Markel, our global Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) Steering Committee comprises more than 2015 senior managers from around the globe who are charged with advising on D&I strategy and providing leadership support and advocacy for our D&I efforts. We have a dedicated leader responsible for talent, diversityan overarching D&I strategy, focusing on our diverse workforce, our inclusive workplace and inclusion,market connectivity, and annual priorities are agreed and shared with leaders. Our human resources (HR) leadership team works to further shape the D&I strategy for our global workforce and to ensure the integration of our D&I efforts with our global talent acquisition and development processes. We recently introducedhave various early career programs open to a diverse range of applicants and a regional scholarship program that is focused on underrepresented groups in the insurance industry, and in late 2020, conducted unconscious bias awareness training that was completed by 79% of insurance employees globally. We are also undertaking a two-year diversity and inclusion training program, including micro learning on priority topics.groups.

In order to maintain a strong program, Markel uses a variety of controls and technology tools designed to identify, detect, prevent, respond to and recover from security threats. Markel regularly tests aspects of our internal security, and we conduct security risk interviews and assessments on third parties with whom we do business, depending on the nature of the relationship. The Company undergoes regular security audits. The CISO participates as part of the Company’s Enterprise Risk Management group where information security risks and mitigation strategies are discussed. The CISO also updates the Board on information security matters. Markel participates in the Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center to share information about the futurelatest cyber threats and howpreparedness measures. Markel also shares threat intelligence information with other partners. Markel has an Incident Response Plan, as well as a Crisis Management Plan, that cover cyber events. An internal team engages in tabletop exercises several times per year in order to enhance preparedness for such situations.

Over the last three years, Markel has not experienced any material information security breaches. Therefore, net expenses, penalties and settlements incurred from information security breaches have been insignificant relative to total revenue. Markel believes that information security and data protection risks are the responsibility of all employees and our actions today affect our world tomorrow,Code of Conduct specifically requires employees to maintain the confidentiality of information. Markel has a mandatory training program covering all information security and we continuedata protection disciplines. In addition, Markel distributes annually to take stepsall insurance operation employees policies on acceptable use and enterprise information security. Contractors are required to reduce our own impact on the environmentprovide certain representations and implement more sustainable practices. Recent advances of this include launching our renewable energy underwriting portfolio, and establishing a global Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) underwriting strategy with the aim of developing products and services that help clients reduce risk, have a positive impact on ESG issues, and encourage better risk management.certifications relating to information security.

At Markel Corporation,Group, in 2023, we continuecontinued to build on our strong governance practices in 2020, including naming Julia Chu to the new role of Chief Risk Officerpractices.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

Report of the Audit Committee

In performing its oversight role, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee also has also discussed with KPMG the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees; has received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and has discussed KPMG’s independence with KPMG. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services (none of which related to financial information systems design and implementation) by KPMG is compatible with maintaining independence and has discussed with KPMG its independence. Based on the review and discussions described in this Report, and subject to the limitations on its role and responsibilities described below and in its charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2023.

The Audit Committee performs the oversight role assigned to it by the Board in its charter. Management, under the oversight of the Audit Committee, is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, internal controls and procedures as well as the establishment and maintenance of programs and controls designed to prevent, deter and detect fraud, all designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for expressing an opinion about whether the financial statements that have been prepared by management with the oversight of the Audit Committee are presented fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. GAAP.generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP). The independent registered public accounting firm is also responsible for expressing an opinion about whether the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting based on established criteria. The applicable established criteria are those in the Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO (the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission). These audits are conducted in accordance with the professional standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The members of the Audit Committee are not accountants or auditors and rely without independent verification on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that the Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles or that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Members of the Audit Committee

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis appearing in this Proxy Statement. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and inincorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.2023.

Members of the Compensation Committee

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Company’s business model builds shareholder value over the long term by generating (i) underwriting profitsearnings from our insurance operations, including underwriting profits, (ii) investment returns from our fixed income and equity portfolios, and (iii) earnings from our ownership interests in variousa diverse portfolio of businesses outsidethat operate in a variety of the insurance marketplace.industries. The Company’s objective is for its employees, including the Company’s executive officers, to earn market competitive base salaries and benefits, and to varying degrees based on career level, have the opportunity to earn significant incentives based on short and long termlong-term performance. The Company also places a strong emphasis on equity ownership, with the expectation that this results in employees thinking and managing the business like owners.

Compensation Philosophy

The Company’s current compensation philosophy is informed by our management philosophy, supplemented by on-going review of developments and by the results of a comprehensive, organization-wide globaltrends in executive compensation review that management conducted in 2018.practices and design. The Markel Style, a spirit of innovation, excellence, and teamwork, areis the foundation of our way of working. Among other things, this involves trust and respect for the abilities of fellow decision makers, challenging the status quo and looking for better ways of doing things.

Our compensation framework and its intended purpose is based on the following principles and objectives:

The following discussion summarizes our executive compensation setting process and examines each of the key elements of compensation, how they are determined, and how they fit within the overall compensation structure.

In general, base salary levels for our executive officers are set by theThe Compensation Committee ofannually reviews and, if appropriate, resets the Board at levels believed to be sufficient to attract and retain qualified executives when considered with other componentscompensation of the Company’s compensation structure.executive officers. The Compensation Committee has not retained a compensation consultant to assist it in determining appropriate compensation levels and has not engaged in any formal benchmarking processes. The Committee has instead relied on the general knowledge, experience, and good judgment of its members, both with regard to competitive compensation levels and the relative success that has been achieved by the Company, as well as information available to the members of the Compensation Committee from sources both within and outside the Company, including data, analysis and recommendations presented by senior management in consultation with CAP (thean outside compensation consultant engaged by senior management).

Each year, management provides the Compensation Committee with updated market information for each executive officer’s compensation. The market information is based on a peer group, which is discussed further below. The peer group data, including data drawn from proxy statement disclosures for named executive officers and survey data for other executives, is used to create percentile comparisons for each executive’s base salary, total cash compensation (base salary plus annual cash incentives) and total direct compensation (base salary plus annual cash incentives plus all long-term incentive awards). The Compensation Committee considers this peer group information as part of its assessment of any proposed adjustments to executive compensation.

With input and recommendations from CAP, senior management identified a peer group of 22 companies for use in connection with developing recommendations for the significantCompensation Committee for compensation practices, design and pay levels for 2023. This peer group, set forth below, was presented to the Compensation Committee.

Peer group data is only one of many factors the Compensation Committee considers in determining executive compensation. Neither senior management, nor the Compensation Committee, targets a specific percentile for any element of compensation or for total compensation, nor does senior management, or the Compensation Committee, target any particular mix of base salary, annual cash incentive opportunities availablecompensation, and long-term equity incentive compensation. Management occasionally provides the Compensation Committee with additional relevant market information, such as emerging compensation trends or the type and prevalence of incentive metrics.

In general, base salary levels for our executive officers are set by the Compensation Committee at levels believed to managersbe sufficient to attract and retain qualified executives when considered with other components of the Company’s subsidiaries based on underwriting performance, the Committee also evaluates total compensation to executive officers to ensure overall fairness.

The named executive officers, as identified under “Executive Compensation” below, are Thomas S. Gayner, Co-ChiefCEO; Michael R. Heaton, Executive Officer, Richard R. Whitt, III, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Robert C. Cox,Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Insurance Operations, Bradley J. Kiscaden, President and Chief Administrative Officer, Insurance Operations,Officer; Jeremy A. Noble, Senior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer, and Insurance;

In February 2020, the Compensation Committee approved a base salary increase for Mr. Noble in recognition of the value of histheir contributions and the importance of fairly and appropriately incenting him. Effective February 24, 2020, Mr. Noble received a salary increase of $50,000, which brought his annualthem, and in connection with changes in the Company’s leadership and organizational structure, the Compensation Committee approved, with effect in 2023, base salary to $550,000. No other adjustments to base salaries of named executive officers were made in 2020.increases for Messrs. Heaton, Noble, Grinnan, and Costanzo, as follows:

The Company offers a competitive package of employee retirement and welfare benefits, in which executive officers participate on the same basis as other salaried employees. The Company’s Retirement Savings Plan is a defined contribution plan qualified under Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). EachExcluding Ms. Gendron, each of the other named executive officers participated in the plan in 20202023 and received the maximum Company contribution under the plan of $25,650$29,700 for the year. Other than the Deferral Plan described below, there is no supplemental benefit plan for executive officers with respect to the Retirement Savings Plan or any employee welfare plan. See “Compensation for Teresa S. Gendron” below for discussion of Ms. Gendron’s base salary.

In November 2015, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted The Markel Corporation Voluntary Deferral Plan (as amended, the Deferral Plan), which became effective April 1, 2016. Subsequently, the Board, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted amendments to the Deferral Plan, which became effective January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2020, respectively. The Deferral Plan is an unfunded, nonqualifiednon-qualified deferred compensation plan maintained for the benefit of a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Company, including the Company’s named executive officers. Below is a brief description of the terms and conditions of the Deferral Plan.

The Deferral Plan is an account-based plan that allows participants to defer voluntarily the payment of current compensation to future years. The Deferral Plan permits each participant to defer up to 30% of base salary and up to 75% of any annual cash award and performance-based cash compensation, which amounts would be credited to an account established for the participant under the Deferral Plan. The amounts credited to a participant’s account will always be fully vested.

Amounts credited to a participant’s account will be indexed to one or more deemed investment alternatives chosen by the participant from a range of alternatives available under the Deferral Plan. Each participant’s account will be adjusted to reflect gains and losses based on the performance of the selected investment alternatives. A participant may elect to receive distributions from the Deferral Plan: (1) upon separation from service, in either a lump sum or annually through installment payments over three, four, or five years, as elected by the participant;years; (2) when a participant reaches a certain age;age, in a lump sum or annually through installment payments over five, ten, or fifteen years; or (3) on dates specified by the participant, between three and fifteen years, in either case, in the future with such in-service distribution payments made in either a lump sum or annual installmentsannually through installment payments over a term of either five, ten, or fifteen years, as elected by the participant.years. The participant’s distribution election regarding in-service payments will be subject to override upon the participant’s death with a lump sum payment. There will be a six month delay for commencement of a payment upon termination of employment to any “specified employee” as defined under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

The Compensation Committee is the administrator of the Deferral Plan.

There arewere no cash amounts payablepaid to any named executive officer under the Deferral Plan for 2020.2023.

In 2020, until May 18, 2020,2023, the Company offered its 2016 Employee stock Purchase and Bonus Plan (the 2016 Stock Purchase Plan) under which our employees and non-employee directors were permittedthe opportunity to purchase our Common Stock through payroll deductions or lump-sum payments atparticipate in the current market price at the time of purchase without any discount. Participating employees and non-employee directors received a stock bonus of ten percent of the net increase in shares of our Common Stock purchased under the 2016 Stock Purchase Plan during a given year. Prior to May 16, 2019, the 2016 Stock Purchase Plan included a loan program that was available only to employees who were not executive officers. Under the loan program, employees were able to take loans from the Company to purchase Common Stock under the 2016 Stock Purchase Plan. Employees who did so received a stock bonus equal to five percent of the number of shares purchased with their loans. Employees who had taken loans under the loan program prior to May 16, 2019 remained eligible to receive cash incentive payments equal to a percentage of their loan balances if certain performance goals were achieved. The 2016 Stock Purchase Plan did not qualify as a tax-advantaged “employee stock purchase plan” under the Internal Revenue Code.

The Company’s incentive compensation program for executive officers generally consists of two elements-cashelements-annual cash incentive compensation paid under the Executive Bonus Plan (the Non-Equity Incentive Plan) and RSUs issued under (i) the 2016 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan) if after April 1, 2016, (ii) the 2012 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan if after April 1, 2012 but before April 1, 2016, or (iii) the Omnibus Incentive Plan if before April 1, 2012.. All executive officers participateparticipated in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan. All executive officersPlan (other than Mr. Costanzo) and were also eligible to receive RSUs for 2020.2023 performance.

Awards to the named executive officers under both the Non-Equity Incentive Plan (other than Mr. Costanzo) and the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan for 20202023 performance were subject to the achievement of pre-established performance goals based on two equally-weighted performance criteria: (1) the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in the Company’s book value per share, and (2) the CAGR in the Company’s totalclosing stock price (total shareholder return,return), both over the five-year period from 20162019 to 2020.2023.

The Company believes that consistent increases in book value enhance the value of the Company and, over time, benefit shareholders through higher stock prices. For this reason, in 2023, the Company usesused growth in book value per share as a performance metric (which takes into account both the profits earned fromincludes all underwriting, operationsoperating, and the earnings of the Company’s investments)investing results) over a period of severalfive years. The calculations of the CAGR in book value per share may be modified by the Compensation Committee to reflect transactions not in the ordinary course which may affect book value, including, but not limited to, share issuances or conversions, share repurchases, dividends, and capital or other transactions affecting book value.

Use of the metric of growth in total shareholder return is meant to acknowledge the participants’ role in formulating and implementing the long-term strategic direction and initiatives of the Company (including the allocation of capital) in consultation with the Board. As the Company has continued to expand and diversify its operations beyond underwriting and investing, the Compensation Committee recognizes that book value per share does not capture all of the economic value in the Company’s business, as a growing portion of the Company’s operations are not recorded at fair value or otherwise captured in book value. In particular, total shareholder return is meant to more appropriately capture the intrinsic value of the Company’s Markel Ventures operations, whose value arguably is not captured in the Company’s book value due to the fact that Markel Ventures companies are not represented on the Company’s balance sheet at “market” but instead at historic cost. Since 2005, the Company has acquired controlling interests in variousa diverse portfolio of businesses that operate outsidein a variety of the specialty insurance marketplaceindustries through its wholly owned subsidiary Markel Ventures, Inc. Though the value of the Markel Ventures operations is difficult to quantify with exact precision, the Compensation Committee believes the value of those operations is captured in the market price of the Company’s stock over time. For the 20202023 performance year, the CAGR in total shareholder return was calculated using the Company’s closing common stockCommon Stock price on December 31, 20152018 and comparing it to the Company’s closing common stockCommon Stock price on December 31, 2020.2023.

The five-year performance period underscores the Company’s long-term perspective and incents and rewards long-term, rather than short-term, decision making and behavior and provides balance between line of sight for actions currently being taken and a long-term perspective in managing the Company’s operations. In addition, using a longer-term measurement period does not encourage the taking of excessive or unnecessary risks in order to earn incentive compensation. The Compensation Committee believes using such a long performance period aligns management’s interests with those of shareholders who are interested in long-term value creation.

The named executive officers have the potential to receive a majority of their total compensation in the form of incentive compensation. Moreover, if the Company achieves excellent performance over a multi-year period, a substantial majority of their total compensation would be in the form of incentive compensation. While

All incentive-based compensation received by the Company believes itnamed executive officers is importantsubject to provide incentive compensation at these levels, it believes it is also important to require sustained performance to achieve maximum payouts.the Markel Group Compensation Recovery Policy. See “Compensation Recovery Policy” below.

The Non-Equity Incentive Plan was approved in May 2018 by the Board upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee. The Non-Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the power and complete discretion to select eligible employees to receive awards thereunder and to determine the type of award and its terms and conditions in accordance with the Non-Equity Incentive Plan. Executive officers of the Company who the Compensation Committee determines have contributed or who can be expected to contribute significantly to the Company are eligible to receive awards under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan. The Non-Equity Incentive Plan was originally designed so that payments would qualify under the performance-based exception to the $1,000,000 deduction limit under Section 162(m) of the Code, although this exception was eliminated effective January 1, 2018.

The performance criteria for 20202023 for the named executive officers related to(other than Mr. Costanzo) were based on growth in book value per share and total shareholder return. The tablestable below under “Non-Equity“Performance-Based Non-Equity Awards and Equity Awards - Performance Criteria” setsets forth the gridsperformance criteria grid approved by the Compensation Committee for determining the performance modifiers to be used to calculate the cash awards payable for 20202023 performance based on various levels of growth in book value achievementper share and total shareholder return and shows the potential value of cash awards, expressed as a percentage of target potential.

The performance modifiers forand the 2020 performance year were as set forth in the table below under “Non-Equity Awards and Equity Awards - Performance Modifier.”

In addition, theThe Compensation Committee reserves the right to approve supplementary cash awards outside of the Non-Equity Incentive Plansole discretion in the case of growth in book value per share or total shareholder return under 6% in determining if cash awards are merited and, if so, in determining the performance modifier(s), subject to a cap of 20% of target potential, to be used to calculate such cash awards. The Compensation Committee also may approve, in its sole discretion, additional cash awards in the case of growth in book value per share or total shareholder return equal to or exceeding 17% or other supplemental cash awards, including awards made outside of the Non-Equity Incentive Plan, under other special circumstances.

The 2016 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders in May 2016 at the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2016 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has the power and complete discretion to select eligible employees who are executive officers to receive equity awards made thereunder and to determine the type of award and its terms and conditions in accordance with the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. Executive officers of the Company who the Compensation Committee determines have contributed or who can be expected to contribute significantly to the Company are eligible to receive equity awards under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee has delegated to the Co-CEO’s, or either of them,Company’s CEO, Executive Vice President, and President, Markel Insurance, the authority to select eligible employees within our insurance operations who are not executive officers to participate in the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan at set levels based on the employee’s position within the Company’s career framework for such employees. The Committee has further delegated authority to these persons to issue discretionary equity awards for newly-hired and current employees up to a certain dollar amount.

The performance criteria for 20202023 for the named executive officers related to growth in book value per share and total shareholder return. The Compensation Committee approved performance-based equity awards, payable in RSUs, in February 20212023 for the named executive officers, as well as other members of management of the Company and its subsidiaries. The tablestable below under “Non-Equity“Performance-Based Non-Equity Awards and Equity Awards - Performance Criteria” setsets forth the gridsperformance criteria grid approved by the Compensation Committee for determining the performance modifiers to be used to calculate the equity awards payable for 20202023 performance based on various levels of growth in book value achievementper share and total shareholder return and shows the potential value of equity awards, expressed as a percentage of target potential.

The performance modifiers forand the 2020 performance year were as set forth in the table below under “Non-Equity Awards and Equity Awards - Performance Modifier.”

The Compensation Committee reserves sole discretion in the case of growth in book value per share or total shareholder return under 6% in determining if equity awards are merited and, if so, in determining the performance modifier(s), subject to a cap of 20% of target potential, to be used to calculate such equity awards. The Compensation Committee also may approve, in its sole discretion, additional equity awards in the case of growth in book value per share or total shareholder return equal to or exceeding 17% or other supplemental equity awards under other special circumstances.

The 2016 Equity Incentive Plan does not allow for stock options.options or stock appreciation rights.

Retention Awards

For recruitment and retention purposes, grants of RSUs have been made under the Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, or the Omnibus Incentive Plan, from time to time as circumstances warrant. NoOther than discretionary RSU awards discussed under “Discretionary Equity Awards” below, no retention awards were made in 20202023 to any of the Company’s named executive officers.

The Company places a strong emphasis on equity ownership by executive officers and other members of senior management. The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that require the Co-CEOsCEO to acquire and maintain ownership of Common Stock with a value at least equal to five times base salary and other members of senior management to acquire and maintain ownership of Common Stock with a value at least equal to one to three times base salary, depending on position. RSUs subject to vesting requirements are counted as owned shares for purposes of the guidelines. Newly hired or newly promoted executives are expected to reach these minimum levels of ownership within five years. All persons who wereOur executive officers in 2020 currently meet or exceed these guidelines, as applicable. See “Policy on Hedging and Pledging of Company Stock” above for information about the hedging and pledging policy applicable to the Company’s executive officers and directors.

The Company provides limited perquisites to its executive officers. In 2020,2023, each of the named executive officers (other than Ms. Gendron) received less than $10,000 in perquisites and personal benefits. During 2023, Ms. Gendron was reimbursed $45,980 for relocation expenses. See “Compensation for Teresa S. Gendron” above for discussion of Ms. Gendron’s compensation.

The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the named executive officers using a templateform of employment agreement for the Company’s executive officers thatapproved by the Compensation Committee adopted in 2018. Committee. On May 26, 2023, the Company entered amended and restated employment agreements with the named executive officers, other than Mr. Costanzo. Each amended and restated agreement updated the name of the Company from Markel Corporation to Markel Group Inc., extended the end of the initial term under the prior agreement for each executive from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2026, and automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless the Company or the executive gives 90 days’ notice of non-renewal. In addition, each amended and restated agreement now includes a reference to the Company’s incentive-based compensation recoupment/clawback policy. Other than these changes, each amended and restated agreement has substantially the same terms and conditions as the prior agreement for each executive. An employment agreement was entered with Mr. Costanzo on December 18, 2023, upon his appointment as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

Each of the employment agreements provides assurances to the Company with regard to the availability of the named executive officer’s services, provides protection for the Company’s confidential information and trade secrets, and restricts the ability of the named executive officers to compete with the Company during their employment and after its termination. In return, the named executive officers are provided assurances with regard to salary, other compensation and benefits, as well as severance benefits if their employment is terminated by the Company other than for “cause.” For this purpose, “cause” includes neglect of duties; willful misconduct; conduct that may result in material injury to the reputation of the Company; active disloyalty; inability to maintain or obtain required regulatory approvals; or breach of obligations relating to confidential information, trade secrets or restrictions on competing with the Company.

In addition, each of the named executive officers areis provided additional assurances following a Changechange in Control.control. In such a situation, they would receive enhanced severance benefits, but only if their employment were terminated without cause or if they chose to terminate their employment for “Good Reason.“good reason.” See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a description of the benefits payable and for definitions of these terms. This additional “double

None of the employment agreements with the named executive officers include provisions for tax gross-ups, in respect of the “parachute payment” tax imposed by Section 280G of the Code or otherwise.

Section 162(m) of the Code imposes a $1,000,000 limit on the amount of U. S. compensation that will be deductible for U. S.U.S. tax purposes by the Company with respect to each of the Chief Executive Officers,Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers (the “Covered Employees”)(each a Covered Employee). In addition, once an individual becomes a Covered Employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a Covered Employee for all future years. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the exception for performance basedperformance-based compensation to the Section 162(m) deduction limit, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a result, compensation paid to oura Covered EmployeesEmployee in excess of $1,000,000 will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Specifically, transition relief provides that changes to Section 162(m) do not apply to compensation under “written binding contracts” in effect as of November 2, 2017, so long as the contracts are not materially modified after that date.

Compensation expense with respect to RSUs under the Equity Incentive Plan, the 2012 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan and the Omnibus Incentive Plan is fixed for accounting purposes based on the fair value of the award at the grant date, i.e., the date on which the Compensation Committee determines the number of RSUs to be awarded. The compensation expense generally is recognized over the period ending when the awards vest.

In February 2013,As required by NYSE listing standards, the Board approvedadopted the adoptionMarkel Group Compensation Recovery Policy, which became effective October 2, 2023. Under the policy, the Company must recover reasonably promptly the amount of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation received by covered officers, including the named executive officers, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the Company’s material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws, including any required accounting restatement to correct an error in previously issued financial statements that is material to the previously issued financial statements, or that would result in a material misstatement if the error were corrected in the current period or left uncorrected in the current period. A copy of the Markel Clawback Policy. If financial resultsCompensation Recovery Policy has been filed withas Exhibit 97 to the SEC are restated due to material non-compliance resulting from fraud or intentional misconduct, the Board or an independent Board committee will review performance-based compensation paid to executive officers who are found to be personally responsibleCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fraud or intentional misconduct that caused the need for the restatement. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Board or an independent Board committee will seek, as it deems appropriate, the recovery on behalf of the Company of any performance-based compensation paid to executive officers whose conduct directly caused the need for restatement. The foregoing will be in addition to seeking any amounts the principal executive officer and principal financial officer may be required to repay under applicable laws.

As set forth in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K, the named executive officers for which we are required to disclose certain compensation information in this Proxy Statement are to include:

Based on the foregoing, the named executive officers identified in this Proxy Statement include the following individuals:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides compensation information for the Company’s Co-PEOs, PFOPEO, PFOs and other named executive officers for services in their capacities as such for 20202023 and preceding years, whereas applicable.